Quantcast
Channel: Lorelai Gilmore – Gilmore News – Gilmore Girls Community

Alexis & Lauren’s Relationship Has Never Been Mother-Daughter

0
0

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

In an interview with Women and Hollywood, Lauren Graham & Alexis Bledel were asked to describe their relationship in real life:

AB: [We’re colleagues] — [Lauren] is someone [I’ve] worked with for a long time and [we] have a mutual understanding.

LG: We’ve never been like mother-daughter. It has always been a partnership. We always worked well together and we have tremendous respect for each other. When Alexis started on the show at age 19, she had a lot of composure. As work colleagues, it’s nicer to be on the same page and we always have been.

I think what Lauren Graham has to say is actually a reflection on Gilmore Girls as well. One of the appealing factors of the show was always the unique relationship dynamic between Lorelai and Rory. That the two were friends, and equals, with Rory sometimes more the “parent” in some ways (Lauren admits that her character had a period of ‘arrested development,’ that she was “still a teenager” in some ways) and Lorelai more the “parent” in other ways. The fact that, in real life, the relationship started on this footing is perhaps what has always made this on-screen dynamic feel natural. 

In another interview, Alexis hypothesizes that being so different is part of the key to the Lorelai & Rory chemistry

They’re so different, like The Odd Couple. They have opposite personalities and preferences, but there are enough overlaps in their habits that make them able to hang out as friends. They really compliment one another and are each really distinctly drawn characters in their own right, so you care about both of them as well as what they mean to each other.

What do you think?

Although unrelated to this lovely thought, the interview also highlights that Sutton Foster will “provide a turning point for Lorelai” to send her along on her journey. This is quite a new revelation about the character that Sutton will be playing!

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share


Gilmore Girls Season 7 — Was It Really So Bad?

0
0

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

From what I understand, Season 7 of Gilmore Girls was judged as less than, as compared to the previous six seasons–maybe even a travesty.  Something was missing.

That something was creators Amy Sherman-Palladino and Dan Palladino.  Beyond being showrunners, they were auteurs, creating a complete living-and-breathing fictional world.  Along with writing and directing episodes, they supervised every plotline, word and image .  The show had their distinct voice, especially evident in the dialogue and characterizations of Lorelai and Rory Gilmore.  This took a lot of work and after six seasons, the Palladinos rightfully asked for extra staff to help ease the grind.  Despite excellent ratings for the network, Warner Bros. turned them down and did not renew their contract (they took away their parking spaces suddenly, like a slap in the face).  Fans were and are still angry about this, feeling that although the show continued and came to somewhat of a conclusion (Rory graduating and getting a journalism job, Lorelai and Luke reuniting), the show felt unfinished.

The team that Warner hired to replace the Palladinos were certainly talented and “kept the lights on”, but the show wasn’t the same.  And ironically, they had to hire extra writers anyhow to make up for the vacuum left.

Ratings sagged and the show was cancelled.  The cast and crew didn’t find out until after the season’s wrap party, robbing them of a proper goodbye.

As Gilmore Girls fandom has grown over the years, with the series binge-watched and debated (i.e. the Gilmore Guys podcast and more), Season 7 has been generally derided.

lorelai-rory-asia-trip

However, when asked about Season 7, Amy Sherman-Palladino said she did not watch it at the time, but has caught up with it on re-runs.  She didn’t diss it–seemingly more interested in seeing where the storylines had gone.  She obviously wanted to note this information in case she had a chance to finish the show as she had intended, last four words and all.  And now she has her chance.

For me, Season 7 is a mixed bag, good with the bad.  It’s a testament to the world and characters the Palladinos built so well, giving the new team a clear template to work from.

The biggest problem for me is the handling of Lorelai and Rory, and since they are the center of the show, it is big hole, but not quite a sink hole.

Here’s the good and bad, at least to me:

The Bad

Chatterbox Lorelai barely speaks in the first two episodes.  After grieving the end of her relationship with Luke, Lorelai does start speaking once again and generally the dialogue is good, sometimes sparkling although the signature pop-culture references are muted.  Character-wise, she seems to go with the flow and doesn’t drive the action.  She falls into marriage to Christopher, then out, then spends time tending to Emily and Rory.  However, I did like the way they repaired her relationship with Luke slowly and in an unforced way (Luke calls Lorelai when April is sick, Luke shows his new neice to Lorelai, Luke comes to help with Richard is in the hospital, Luke stitches together the tent for Rory’s goodbye party).

Rory was a biggest letdown for me.  We got to know her as a super-bright, super-ambitious girl who dreamed from an early age about attending Harvard and then becoming Christiane Amampour.  She pursues these dreams with great persistence despite the many bumps and detours along the way.  Relationships are important to her but what we truly admire is her ambition and talent (yea Team Rory!).  In Season 7, she becomes a simpering girlfriend type, mooning over Logan, seemingly helpless without him.  His ups and downs domiante her life.  She’s not the Rory who faces down Paris, talks back to Emily, or takes charge of the Yale Daily News.  Also, her passivity over handling her future–fearing a void after graduation, worrying she’ll never get a job as a journalist.  Maybe it’s realistic–I had no clue when I graduated.  But Rory was always self-driven, better and smarter than us mere mortals.

Paul Anka turned into a fairly regular and rarely seen pooch.  Disappointing.

kirks-diner

The Good:

Generally, I found there were some terrific moments in Season 7–actually some of my favorite.  Plus in general, the supporting characters and eccentric Stars Hollow happenings were handled much as before.

Here are some of the moments I loved the best:

  • Luke and Christopher’s Neanderthal fight in the town square, wrecking the Christmas decorations.  This was so primal and satisfying, a long time coming.
  • Lane being wheeled through the streets on her bed, Monkees’ style to her baby shower.
  • The Knit-a-Thon that Christopher ruins, showing how he doesn’t get or belong in Stars Hollow.
  • Lorelai heartbreakingly singing “I Will Always Love You” while Luke looks on.
  • Kirk wrecking Luke’s Diner and then opening Kirk’s Diner across the street, taking advantage of the situation, even offering Luke a job application.
  • Christiane Amampour giving Rory advice in the final episode, “Bon Voyage”.
  • Emily in jail.

In general, I liked how Emily was handled, feeling she stayed in character–as controlling and clueless as ever.

I especially loved Lane’s pregnancy–which apparently Keiko was not thrilled about–because it brought her in direct conflict with her mother.  But through this, Lane began to understand her mother’s motivations a bit more, while also hating how much his mother and Zach bonded over the pregnancy.

lane-wheeled-in-bed

Paris was as Paris as ever, whether typically crazy detailed plans on her pre-graduation plans or breaking up with Doyle to not influence her choice of graduate school and career direction.  I’m always happy whenever there’s a scene with Paris.

And finally, I think they got Luke right.  In the absence of Lorelai, they filled the vacuum his family and the other supporting characters–April and the custody battle, his sister Liz and her husband T.J. having a baby, plus Kirk and Zach at the diner.  Throughout, Luke showed what an upstanding guy he was and why we got to love him so much.

All in all, whatever the merits or demerits of Season 7, things did feel unfinished leading now to Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life.  More Gilmore Girls, finally!  So for that, I judge Season 7 to be a success.  Huzzah!

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

The Gilmore Guide to Firing Your Chef

0
0

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

There are more!! Following up to the pre-release ‘Gilmore Guide’ series, we now have The Gilmore Guide to Firing Your Chef! This is kind of like a sequel to Emily’s Gilmore Guide to Firing Your Maid, you know, if they had made such a guide! 

We’re coming full circle here. Emily didn’t fire anyone, but Lorelai sure made up for it! Over and over and over again!

Check out the full series of Gilmore Guides: The Gilmore Guide to Stars HollowThe Gilmore Guide to ProduceThe Gilmore Guide to Reading Like RoryThe Gilmore Guide to Friday Night Dinner Don’tsThe Gilmore Guide to FriendshipThe Gilmore Guide to Movie NightThe Dirty Gilmore Guide, and The Gilmore Guide to Paris Geller. 

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Michel’s Personal Life Finally Revealed

0
0

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

During the seven seasons of the original Gilmore Girls series, few clues were doled out about Michel’s background and personal life.  We knew that he was French, was so surly that it seemed improbable Lorelai would employ him, was obsessed with his weight and his dogs and Celine Dion, and was boldly confident about his skills as a dancer.  Other than that, there was no mention of some crucial points.  There were no details about his upbringing (other than us seeing his mother in one episode), how he’d ended up in Stars Hollow, where he lived, or who he dated.

Now, with A Year in the Life, we found out Michel is at this point married to a man and both are looking to adopt a child.  Yanic Truesdale spoke to Business Insider about this revelation:

I found out about it when I read the script.

Yanic had never previously discussed Michel’s sexuality with Amy Sherman-Palladino.  He along with everyone else was left to wonder:

Some fans thought I had a secret crush on Lorelai. I mean, everyone has their own take on him.

These new details gave Yanic more to work with:

You know, the fact that he’s married, the children issue, the crossroads with his work, and having to make big decisions in his life made me connect with him at a deeper level. And that was great. I’ve always wanted to have more personal stuff for him, because it’s satisfying to go there for an actor. So I’m happy about it.

For Yanic, sexuality was never a defining factor of how he played the character anyhow.

Mostly, he’s defined by his irritants or being French and everything that entails. This is the foundation that I’ve worked with, so either way, for me whatever his love life was didn’t affect my choices as an actor.

In the end, the gift to Yanic is that his character affected the larger story–something that Michel had never really done before.  At most, he had provided comic relief.  Here, because Michel needed to make more money to support his growing family, Lorelai was motivated to give Michel a bigger stake by expanding her business.  This dovetailed nicely with the storylines about Lorelai’s need to move forward in her life and the money Richard left to Luke, plus it cemented the bond between Michel and Lorelai.  Hopefully if there are more episodes, we’ll see them build their new Dragonfly Spa, with Michel as the manager. Apparently we already missed a pivotal scene about the purchase of the building!

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Lorelai Goes “Wild”: Book or Movie?

0
0

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

lorelai-hiking-with-bear-hatThe “Fall” episode of Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life features Lorelai going “wildly” out of character by following in the footsteps of Cheryl Strayed as chronicled in her book Wild to hike the Pacific Crest Trail.  When Lorelai gets there, she finds many other women also trying to find themselves by doing the hike.  Amy Sherman-Palladino parodies the scenario and the women but told Buzzfeed that she wasn’t making fun of Wild:

I just thought [Wild] was a really great, beautiful platform that was resonating amongst women.  At the heart and soul of Gilmore Girls … it is a show about women: interesting women, smart women, grappling with more than just romance. They’re really grappling with who they are.

Although Amy Sherman-Palladino does give allow the women hikers to voice some geniune reasons why they are attempting the arduous trip, she parodies the trendiness of these types of phenomenons, with so many quick to jump on the latest bandwagon to emotional and spiritual enlightenment (wasn’t it Eat, Pray, Love just a few years ago?).  She also gets into the class system within this trendy movement, where the hikers are divided by “book or movie”, meaning whether they were inspired by Cheryl’s book (deeper, more genuine hikers) or Reese Witherspoon’s movie adaptation (trendy types who just saw the movie on a plane or cable). However, if you’re going to go on an emotional/spiritual quest, isn’t hiking better for you than joining a cult?

For our hero, Lorelai, even though she is following the herd as much as anyone else, she is taking herself way out of her comfort zone in hopes of getting unstuck.  In the end, she discovers by accident that she has to find her own path.

The use of Wild in A Year in the Life was as much a surprise to Cheryl Strayed as anyone else–she told Buzzfeed that she found out when she saw the trailer and spotted Lorelai reading Wild poolside.

The fact that the writers of this show decided to tell my story within their own story, I feel honored and amazed.  Like truly amazed, and deeply flattered.

screen-shot-2016-11-18-at-1-14-46-pm

When asked about the fun poked at the hikers, being asked “book or movie”, she said:

That’s one of the things that makes people love Gilmore Girls so much, is there’s often truth and poignancy layered among ridiculousness and humor.  That was obviously a spoof or a comic moment, but there were some pieces of real truth in there, too.

In terms of the mother-daughter dynamic in Gilmore Girls, Cheryl says she identifies with Lorelai and Rory:

Wild is about two things: It’s about my hike on the Pacific Crest Trail, and it’s also about my love for my mother, and my grief.  It’s the story of our life and our relationship, and so I was so identifying in what I was seeing in Rory’s journey, too.  I was that girl who wrote about the complexities of the love and bond that I have with my mother.

And although Lorelai did not end up making the same physical journey as Cheryl, the emotional journey was similar:

I always say to people when they ask me if they should hike the PCT, it’s not so much about specifically hiking the PCT or following in my footsteps.  You can’t replicate what I did, but go find your own journey.  Go do something that makes you feel.

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Lauren Graham Redefined the TV Mom

0
0

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

In Lauren Graham’s new book, Talking as Fast as I Can: From Gilmore Girls to Gilmore Girls, she details how she started her TV career playing the “Gal About Town”, a post-college type that many actresses want to hang onto before they’re consigned to the dreaded “Mom” roles, i.e. the wasteland of female roles.  Traditionally, The Mom is the one who reacts to what her husband or kids are doing instead of having a life or dreams of her own.  When Lauren first read the Gilmore Girls pilot, she was 31 years old.  She was asked if she’d be worried about getting typecast at such an early age as a mom, but she says:

I never once thought about it.  To me, Lorelai was equal parts Gal About Town and The Mom, plus a magical mix of smarts and humor that made her totally unique.

It did help that along with being a TV mom, we also saw her as Emily’s daughter, rebellious and sometimes bratty.  Lili Loofbourow in The Week writes an essay of appreciation about how Lauren has redefined the TV mom:

Graham’s combination of Katharine Hepburn’s grand dame confidence with an almost vaudevillian gift for slapstick goes a long way toward explaining how she so convincingly restored the single mother to glamour, great boots, and something other than pathos.

Of course, a great actress also needs great writing.  Lorelai Gilmore is the creation of Amy Sherman Palladino and Dan Palladino and the article traces the roots of this new TV mom to their stint writing for the show Roseanne.  Roseanne Conner was a revolutionary character–a mother who could be sweet but also abrasive, sarcastic, overbearing and hilarious.  She was allowed her own internal life with her own hopes and dreams that didn’t necessarily involve her kids or husband.  Lili adds:

But Roseanne was married, and Lorelai Gilmore wasn’t.  Funny single mothers in fiction are few, and it’s a testament to Lauren Graham’s raw comedic talent that she managed to convey the struggles without collapsing them into the typical vocabularies of pathos and heroism.

Although, to be fair, Murphy Brown blazed that trail almost a decade before as a single mother on TV, being so apparently transgressive that she was actually denounced by then Vice President Dan Quayle who seemed to think Murphy Brown was a real person and could single-handedly end civilization as it was known.

lorelai-and-luke-dance

I would add that Lauren provided something new–sex.  Although she was devoted to being a mother, it didn’t mean she couldn’t be stylish and “Juicy” nor that she couldn’t flirt with and date men.  Now, that was unusual for a TV mom.

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Which Gilmore Girl Are You Now?

0
0

Share

As you well know, Gilmore Girls first aired in 2000. Watchers who were then Rory’s fresh-faced 16 years of age would now be older than the 32-year old Lorelai who faced Headmaster Charleston in the get-up above.  Man, you can feel Emily rolling her eyes from space.

My friend Jack reads The Lord of the Rings every few years and finds different parts affect him with each read, because he’s changed over time. Which led me to wondering (drum roll please):

Did you previously identify with Rory but now think of yourself more like Lorelai?

It’s a bit of a nonsense question since Rory didn’t become Lorelai, she became older Rory. And I think this is where a lot of Rory-related fury about the new episodes comes from, because those who identified with Rory wanted to see her succeed or at least do more than stall.

I’ve talked before about Rory’s stalled trajectory being necessary in order to get to The Last Four Words but perhaps her course was set long before A Year In The Life. Clearly she would never become Lorelai because they were completely different people with very different characters. Compare young book-smart Rory with young feisty Lorelai.

Also, Rory rarely had to fight for what she wanted. In fact, did she ever really know what she wanted, other than what Lorelai or the many other loving people around her wanted for her? It was Lorelai that put college into Rory’s head. It was the boys that lined up to throw themselves at her, rather than her actively pursuing any boy. Her only active decision that comes to mind was to steal the boat.

So as much as I love Rory and was so very proud of her on so many occasions, compared to Lorelai she might have been a teensy bit… boring? But again, that’s a nonsense question since Lorelai is the poster child for mania. Still. In the end, I think I’d rather have Rory over for game night but go out dancing with Lorelai.

Out of interest, did you previously identify with one character but now think of yourself more like the other, or a different character? I feel like I started out as Richard and now I’m grumpy black-cap Luke fast en route to Taylor Doose.
Looking back at Lorelai’s eye-catching Chilton get-up, I’m reminded of our Gilmore Girls Cosplay Competition.  Which Gilmore Girls character would you dress up like today? I’m feeling a bit of Kirk, recognizable by the caged swans.
Do parts of the show resonate differently as you’ve gotten older?
Do you think Rory ever really knew what she wanted?

Share





Latest Images